Cardboard Gerald shirt contest rules

To mark my 100,000th tweet and my massive use of time to make stupid jokes, I’m doing a contest to give away my medium size Cardboard Gerald t-shirt, which you can see below:

So with the help of a good friend, we’ve decide to conduct this in the following manner:

1. In Apples To Apples style, I will tweet out something (a person, a place, an event, something) for y’all to respond to as my 100,000th tweet (I’ve updated this post with it at the top). I will repost it here and remind people about the contest so people won’t be left out.

2. If you wish to be considered, tweet me back a joke OR a drawing OR a photoshop that relates to my original tweet. I’d also appreciate it if you tag the tweet with the hashtag #CardboardContest. You won’t be disqualified for not having it as long as you @ me in the tweet (I understand Twitter’s character limits can ruin the best laid jokes), but it would help me organize this.

3. The one I find funniest will be selected as the winner and I will contact them about where to send the shirt.

Consideration for the contest will begin immediately after the tweet and will end Friday October 26 at midnight EST. The winner will be announced the following day.

One entry per person

Good luck everyone and thank you for mostly being a bunch of neat lovely people

The Great Burrito Challenge Story

In the town of Chapel Hill, it often seems the sun touches every bit of ground. Even through the tapestry of leafy branches in parts of densely-wooded areas, the land is often so bright and the air so light that it looks like it could be fabricated by Pixar.

And then there’s Bandido’s Mexican Cafe.

Tucked away in the heart of Chapel Hill’s cozy and lively downtown, the restaurant is almost hidden. And unlike the rest of the charming college town, no natural light ever finds its way down the stairs in the Franklin Street alley that Bandido’s calls home.

During my descent down the short flight of stairs, I couldn’t have been more thankful for the shroud of darkness that would engulf me during one of my most foolhardy decisions. I was about to attempt to increase my weight by five percent in one fell swoop by trying to eat El Gigante, the locally-famous burrito challenge at Bandido’s.

El Gigante weighs in at 4.5 pounds and, until recently, was available for anyone to order with the reward of a free t-shirt and a photo on a wall upon completion. But recently a high school kid tried to eat El Gigante and fell ill. After the parents threatened to sue Bandido’s, owner Tony Sustaita decided the restaurant would now require parental consent for minors to undertake the endeavor. Intrigued by the attraction of such a challenge and interested in understanding the physical implications of attempting such a feat, I decided it required a firsthand experience.

Emerging from the alley and walking into Bandido’s feels nearly like being transported to an indistinctive limbo between anywhere and nowhere. Frankly, it’s just a basement with brick walls painted with palm trees and crude island scenery and some traditional Mexican-American style decorations. No location feels so distant and separated from the rest of the town like Bandido’s does. And yet, that was just what I hoped for in a location where I was to embarrassingly engorge myself way past my normal eating habits.

After the waitress sent my order to the kitchen, my mind swirled, enraptured in speculation of the size of the burrito. The thought had crossed my mind before, but it wasn’t until after the point of no return that I realized I couldn’t actually fathom an estimate of the burrito’s physical size. My confidence upon entering Bandido’s may have been at the level of a competitive eater, but doubt was now beginning to creep in.

—————————————————————————————————-

Days after my attempt, Takeru Kobayashi, the six-time Nathan’s Annual Hot Dog Eating Contest champion, gave me his advice that he would give a normal person trying to take down an unusually-large order of food. The world record-holding competitive eater broke it down into two parts: preparation and eating strategy.

“First understand your own condition and any possible strengths you may have,” Kobayashi said. “And then safely begin stretching the capacity of your stomach with different techniques. I drink water. Lots of it, in different volumes over a certain period of time.”

I did none of this.

As for mid-meal strategy, he emphasized understanding your prey: the ingredients, the texture, and what would be the easiest way to eat it and advance it to your stomach. “I believe it is first important to be able to understand how to break down that particular food into a size where I can physically hold it in my hands,” Kobayashi added. “Not necessarily so small it fits easily into my mouth, but at least a size where I can hold and maneuver it.”

I also did minimal amounts of this, and none of what he suggested about being able to hold it.

In hindsight, it is clear that doom had followed my every step from the beginning. And Kobayashi certainly had words of warning for trying to eat something like this with no preparation. “All the risks imaginable are there: any physical discomfort or dangers of the stomach, jaw, throat and certainly a lot of heartburn.”

I was undoubtedly unprepared. But such risks are the price to pay for journalistic integrity.

—————————————————————————————————-

Thankfully, I didn’t have to worry too much about possible insult being added to injury. Despite the magnitude and size of the order, the staff neglected to make the extraordinary dinner into the spectacle it could have been. El Gigante arrived like any other meal. The couple next to me was clearly amused and somewhat bemused by the thin, 115-pound college kid being served a dish the size of a small infant.

Truth be told, El Gigante is not so much a burrito as it is a tortilla calzone with the ingredients within a thick folded tortilla. The burrito completely covers the plate upon which it is served. Ten ingredients come inside the tortilla: rice, black beans, onions, tomatoes, cheese, salsa verde, steak and chicken fajitas with sautéed onions and bell peppers. But wait, there’s more! The tortilla is topped with salsa roja, more shredded cheese, lettuce, tomato, sour cream and guacamole.

In spite of that intimidating list of ingredients, El Gigante doesn’t seem unconquerable, though. For a minute, I let it cool and analyzed it, trying to form a strategy. I spread out the sour cream and guacamole and just began to cut it and eat it with a fork and knife, piece by piece.

It began easily enough, but after clearing the toppings and getting into the center, trouble began. The steak was tough and tiring, slowing me down and hurting my chances to fool my brain into letting me eat more than my body normally permitted before it received the signal from my stomach that I was full.

At midway, my stomach began to tighten and contract, a telltale sign my brain was telling my body it could not hold much more. But I convinced myself that it would just be all downhill if I could reach the three-quarters mark.

I never did.

At one point my fork accidentally shoveled pure guacamole into my gullet. I held back immediate urges to purge, but with that I recognized hope was futile. I wouldn’t last much longer, even with unbuckling my belt and unbuttoning my pants.

Within minutes, I admitted defeat. Man vs. food – winner: food, by technical knockout.

—————————————————————————————————-

After paying the bill, I returned to the rest of the world in a bloated stupor with a hefty to-go box of leftovers. I hadn’t gotten sick and my shame stayed within the dark hidden corridor. I took those as reasonable moral victories.

But the challenge still perplexed me. With the risk of shame, intense discomfort and vomiting, why do people want to attempt something where the reward is just a t-shirt and a photograph?

Much like George Mallory and Mt. Everest, the answer seems to be “Because it’s there.” Sustaita says he thinks the main attraction is simply the challenge. UNC-Chapel Hill student Dylan D’Joseph, who ate El Gigante in 20 minutes, did it on the spur of the moment for the sake of the challenge during a casual dinner with friends.

Though I hadn’t been successful, more than a handful have defeated El Gigante. In fact, rumors say one man has done it so easily and so often that he’s become a legend of sorts. Sean Ryall is now currently somewhere in Brazil on a Mormon mission and cannot be contacted, but he was known among his friends to take down El Gigante in unimaginable ways. A competitive swimmer that regularly ate calorie-intensive meals, he supposedly racked up nearly $200 in restaurant vouchers for eating the massive burrito so many times, two of his acquaintances said. Further, I was told he holds the El Gigante record for fastest time, somewhere in the neighborhood of three minutes. Sustaita denies both of these claims. The mystery lives on.

At the same time, El Gigante has tallied close to three times as many defeats as victors, crushing 70 to 75 percent of wannabe conquerors, says Sustaita. This list of casualties includes Sustaita, who has failed to best El Gigante in three attempts. This can be dangerous because of the health risks involved in eating an abnormally large burrito.

Matt Paolillo experienced these dangers firsthand when he tried a similar burrito challenge this past March at Pico Taco in Washington, D.C. Though he regularly eats a lot of food, he could not escape cruel fate. This included “sweating, nausea, discomfort, a sense that I had let down my parents and everyone I care about because I couldn’t eat a really big burrito,” Paolillo said.

And then he threw up immediately after the event and didn’t eat for about 36 hours, he recalled.

But perhaps the risk isn’t just for the competitors.

Jeffrey Mervosh, a witness to Paolillo’s endeavor at Pico Taco, saw the lone champion in their group await his prize, a free t-shirt and photo.

“The girl who took the picture asked if he wanted to see if it turned out OK before they printed it on the wall,” Mervosh said. “He just said ‘I really don’t care. I’m never eating here again.’”

An addendum on the stigma associated with blogging

I just had a very interesting discussion on Twitter about the “clownfraud” stigma associated with being a blogger and whether it can be erased completely.

We all agreed the answer is no, it cannot be removed.

But I think that’s perfectly fine. My previous piece didn’t intend to take down the stigma, but rather the complete dismissal of a medium without any consideration of the writer’s ability solely because of the form.

I think we can make a metaphor between blogging and pickup basketball in these regards (or pick-up whatever sport you want). Assuming you’re not an NBA player, let’s pretend you’re going into a gym where you’ve never played before. You know no other players on the floor. Before anyone even takes practice shots, do you assume they’re all trash? Maybe they tell you they all played Division I ball — do you take them at their word?

Of course not. If you’re anything like me, or most pick-up players, you understand to be prepared for whatever. Don’t assume the small dude can’t destroy you and don’t assume the tall guy will be a force. You wait for them to show their skills on the court before trying to definitely analyze them, right?

That’s all I want when it comes to the stigma about blogging. Don’t judge the medium; judge the player on their talents. In other words, don’t throw out opinions because they come from bloggers instead of from a traditional form of media. And conversely, you shouldn’t assume quality writing is coming from those traditional media outlets, regardless of how much they supposedly value credibility. Read the writing first (and try to leave your bias at the door), and then decide whether I’m full of crap or not.

I used to do the same reprehensible thing with the infamous Bleacher Report blogging website. The site’s a magnet for what becomes joke fodder in internet circles because with such little burden to access, any idea gets through to a large audience. Though there’s still a good many articles there that make me sigh or laugh, they do in all honesty have some good writing over there whether you want to believe it or not.

From Bleacher Report to SB Nation, the stigma will forever be there, and you know what — who cares!

Blogging is a wonderful thing, whether it’s about sports or anything else. The barrier to entry is so low that anyone can have a voice, which can do great things when it comes to issues that don’t see much light.

This is undoubtedly a double-edged sword. While some may have much valuable experience and wisdom to share over the Internet, others may spout nonsense all willy-nilly — or worse. Thankfully the cream rises and those that separate themselves as respectable bloggers will probably see results if they have the dedication and passion for it.

I find that broadening perspectives and spreading understanding through well-informed yet under-reported opinions even in spite of giving an outlet to the ignorant opinions is incredibly valuable — much more valuable than having no outlet for the ignorant views at the expense of the competent ones as well.

So for the foreseeable future there will probably be a stigma associated with a passion for blogging. Whatever. I just want people to not pass judgment on a medium and deem it incompetent because it doesn’t fit biased outdated perspectives on respectable media. Blogging has shown it’s earned as much.

Old media Luddism and the new world of blogging

The past couple years as a journalism student at UNC, I’ve faced the same questions on the first days of classes each semester: “What’s your name, hometown and something interesting about yourself?”

And each class, every semester, my mind races with how I’m going to answer the last part of the introductory question that forms the foundation of my peers’ perception of me.

Do I say My name is Ben, I’m from Charlotte and I cover the Charlotte Bobcats for SB Nation? Do I replace that last part with and I’m the managing editor of SB Nation’s Charlotte Bobcats site?

Or do I just come out and say I blog about the Charlotte Bobcats?

Maybe this is over-analyzing the situation. I do tend to think that way. But the perception when it comes to a journalistic position and the word “blogger,” the connotations are very far apart. One is thought of a respectable profession and the other is often thought of as simply some bozo spilling his wild thoughts to the frenzied frontier that is the Internet, a lowly basement-dweller beneath the regard of even the loons that pen letters to the editor. And I have to think about how this will characterize me to my peers.

You could be a sports columnist writing homophobic columns for a small newspaper and that title will give you higher repute than blogging better-written pieces. And yet the old guard of print media with their feet willingly planted in concrete penny loafers tries to perpetuate this stereotype of bloggers being poor writers, wantonly making mistakes with reckless disregard for truth and effort that covering anything should get.

It’s rather disgusting. I understand that the financial viability of print media is faltering and has been for years now, and that saddens me. Like other art forms I hold dear, I value the physical form. I like reading newspapers and magazines to the extent that I have a newspaper subscription and pick up magazines that intrigue me whenever I can.

But even more than that, I like reading strong writing founded on good research. Unfortunately for newspapers (and other tenured media), print media is no longer the only major outlet for those who wish to express their well-researched opinions to a large audience.

On the whole, this is a good thing. It’s evolution of journalism, for better or for worse. Wider access for people creates a much more diverse landscape of viewpoints on a more diverse variety of topics, leading to a more informed audience. Quality writing for large audiences is no longer constrained to mainstream media outlets. Sticking your head in the sand and feet in the ground while making unfounded ad hominem attacks against bloggers is little more than journalistic Luddism. Further, if traditional media are such credible sources of news and writing, then why are their credibility ratings continuing to fall?

Times are certainly changing, especially evident with the wave of old-school writers joining Twitter to interact with the readers on the Internet. Thankfully, some of the aforementioned “old guard of print media” are eager to recognize the merits of blogging and are receptive to the new development. And though perception is changing, some refuse to accept that many of those who write online are not only gifted writers with expertise in their beats but trained as such with journalism and English degrees. We are not so different. In a different media landscape, a fair number of bloggers would have joined you at the horseshoe copy desk.

Ever still, newspaper scribes like the Boston Globe’s Kevin Paul Dupont continue to put down bloggers as some kind of third-world writing. He likens bloggers to the “replacement reporters/writers” of journalism, nothing more than mere typists. Dupont pats himself and his peers on the back for charity work, making a mockery of his own underlying reasons for goodwill just to slam bloggers from a nonexistent moral high ground that he fails to research for a second. If he had, he’d notice the $200,000 that comic blogger sensation The Oatmeal raised for charities. Or if he just wants to focus on the sports realm, these are some I found in five minutes of Google searching — just on SB Nation. He cries that bloggers lack ethics or morals, but perhaps the ultimate ethical fault is laziness, and Dupont has certainly exemplified this as he tries to deflect his insecurities with uber-machismo wit that reeks of what I call “Trying Too Hard Syndrome.”

Bloggers have come a long way to legitimacy. They’re making their way onto your television sets, into your newspaper (HEAVEN FORFEND!), onto your radios, into your favorite team’s front office, in your media availability scrums asking the best questions, you name it. The close-minded people that continue to demean blogging like Dupont are on the wrong side of journalistic and media history. Their intent is to hurt the image of blogging, yet just end up damaging their own.

Blogging has rightfully emerged as a growing new medium, especially in sports writingSo you’re damn right I’ve come to welcome my position writing in this so-called “blogosphere” with pride.

My name is Ben Swanson and I’m from Charlotte.

And I’m a blogger.

Excerpt from Untitled Giant Burrito Story

Days after my attempt, I asked Takeru Kobayashi, the six-time Nathan’s Annual Hot Dog Eating Contest champion, what advice he would give someone trying to take down an unusually-large order of food. The famed competitive eater broke it down into two parts: preparation and eating strategy.

“First understand your own condition and any possible strengths you may have,” Kobayashi said. “And then safely begin stretching the capacity of your stomach with different techniques. I drink water. Lots of it, in different volumes over a certain period of time.”

I did none of this.

As for mid-meal strategy, he emphasized understanding your prey: the ingredients, the texture, and what would be the easiest way to eat it and advance it to your stomach. “I believe it is first important to be able to understand how to break down that particular food into a size where I can physically hold it in my hands,” Kobayashi added. “Not necessarily so small it fits easily into my mouth, but at least a size where I can hold and maneuver it.”

I also did minimal amounts of this, and none of what he suggested about being able to hold it.

In hindsight, it was clear I was doomed from the beginning. And Kobayashi certainly had words of warning for trying to eat something like this unprepared. “All the risks imaginable are there: any physical discomfort or dangers of the stomach, jaw, throat and certainly a lot of heartburn.”

I was undoubtedly unprepared. But such risks are the price to pay for journalistic integrity.

Blogging Lyric of the Day: “Shine Bloggas”

I’m on my grind, shawty, don’t blog my shine shawty,
Wait a minute, wait a minute, chill a little, sit a minute,
I can’t close my post no more ’cause I got too many comments in it.

– Big Boi, feat. Gucci Mane

Pro Golf and Hypocrisy

Golf is a beautiful mirage. Fans hold its morals and etiquette high above every other sport on a noble pedestal. It’s so very gentlemanly, you see. They wear nice pants and polo shirts and a clean white glove on one hand. They stride the course heads high, holding nothing. They don’t hold their clubs, the caddies hold the clubs. Can’t have those golfers carrying their own clubs, of course. That wouldn’t be very noble.

And nothing exemplifies this more than the Masters.

There’s no need for me to introduce the Masters – it’s the king of the golfing world. You win the Masters and you take home a million-dollar purse, immense honor, seeing your name splashed across Sports Illustrated in the next issue and, of course, donning one of the ultimate trophies in sports: the green jacket.

That’s just the outside. Viewers see the pressed pants, the tucked in shirts, the caddies in clean white jumpsuits, the beautifully-manicured course.

But it’s all a disgusting farce.

Golf is so fantastic because as an individual sport, it’s almost like a microcosm of life. Alone in nature, there are little to no distractions, optimally. You need not judge your ability but only by the benchmarks you hold yourself. Hole by hole, you take upon yourself the goal of getting a tiny ball in a hole in the ground. If you make mistakes, you deal with them and plod onward. Frustration mounts often for players because even masterful skill can easily mean little with just a slight sudden gust of wind. Understandably, emotions can run high.

That is, unless you’re on the PGA Tour playing in the Masters.

On Friday, Tiger Woods shanked a tee shot into a sand trap. Immediately upon seeing his shot heading off-course, he dropped his club to the ground and kicked it.

Within hours I saw an article about his actions, calling them “the equivalent of wiping your nose on the green jacket.”

The sport prides itself on eschewing these types of emotional reactions. They’re not elegant. It’s disgraceful to the game, the champions of the sport say. People love seeing the raw emotion of the victor in their moment of glory. But they can’t bear to see the other end of the spectrum: the frustration that the athletes endure at the highest level of competition in their sport at its most visible event.

To call such actions dishonoring the game is laughable, especially during the Masters at Augusta. Augusta National is a place where women can’t be members in 2012. A place where African-Americans couldn’t become members until 1990. A place where a female journalist was refused entrance to the locker room for an interview in 2011. A place where a founding member said “As long as I’m alive, all the golfers will be white and all the caddies will be black.”

But they hold this honor of the game high above everyone’s heads as the objective for every person regardless of how well they’re playing. It’s a disgrace that players must abide by stoicism lest they be shunned as a dishonorable athlete.

We loved Michael for leaving everything inside him in the basketball court. We loved the moment he collapsed under the sheer weight of his emotions after he won the 1996 NBA Championship on Father’s Day, his first title since his father’s death. We loved the moments he fought his toughest opponents, win or lose. We loved the moments he barked trash talk and bantered with those brave enough to return fire. We hated to see him fall, but loved it because we knew he’d rise from it. To deny us the passion of frustrating losses is to deny us the captivating emotion of defeating it.

But maybe basketball’s not the honorable sport that golf is.

I couldn’t care less about that. The nobility is a farce, elitism in the sports world at its worst. Show humanity in the thick of your passion and unless it’s utter joy, you’re shaming the game and so you must be shamed, as well. They’ll call it immaturity, but if maturity means swallowing your frustration, then I know zero mature people.

And everyone seems to just accept this.

I guess I should be shamed, too. I don’t play much anymore, but I grew up playing it. At golf, I was decent. At swearing, I was superb. Yet I loved it. It’s just you and the course. You go through the journey of your emotions, frustrations and elations and come out with an experience that makes you feel like you accomplished something. Refusing to even accept expressing yourself during a game because of dishonoring the sport is stressing dated traditions over humanity.

Ah, just another year of hypocrisy at the Masters.